The Graph vs Goldsky vs Envio: Which Blockchain Indexer Should You Use?
Comparing The Graph, Goldsky, and Envio for blockchain indexing in 2026 — sync speed, pricing, multi-chain support, and which fits which use case.
Choosing a blockchain indexer involves more than sync speed. Compare the handler model, supported chains, query interface, reorg behavior, and where indexed data will live.
The comparison below focuses on subgraph and application-indexing workflows. Benchmark your own contracts and queries before making a performance or cost decision.
The Graph: Subgraphs on a Decentralized Network
The Graph uses subgraphs to define indexed entities and mappings. Its former hosted service closed on June 12, 2024; the decentralized network uses independent Indexers that stake GRT and serve queries.
What The Graph does well:
- Existing subgraphs and community examples
- A documented schema and mapping model
- A decentralized network for query serving
- Subgraph Studio for development and publishing
Where The Graph has friction:
- Benchmark historical sync against your event volume and handler logic
- Review query pricing and payment options for your expected traffic
- Check whether your chains and cross-chain query needs fit the subgraph model
- Account for AssemblyScript when using conventional subgraph mappings
Best fit: Protocols that want the widest ecosystem compatibility, are publishing public data for community use, or need the censorship-resistance properties of a decentralized indexing network.
Goldsky: Speed and the Mirror Pipeline
Goldsky offers managed subgraphs and pipelines that stream indexed data into external destinations. Its current pipeline offering is presented as Turbo Pipelines on its pricing page.
What Goldsky does well:
- Managed hosting for Graph-compatible subgraphs
- Pipelines for sending data to your own database or warehouse
- A migration path for existing subgraph projects, subject to compatibility testing
- Chain and destination choices to evaluate against your workload
Where Goldsky has friction:
- Confirm reorg and deletion behavior for the chosen pipeline and destination
- Plan for provider outages and recovery
- Estimate costs from published pricing and obtain a quote where needed
Best fit: Teams that need fast sync, want data in their own warehouse for analytics, or are migrating off The Graph Network to reduce GRT overhead.
Envio: Modern TypeScript-Native Indexing
Envio takes a different approach: instead of AssemblyScript mappings and a declarative YAML manifest, you write handlers in TypeScript (or JavaScript), define your schema in a config file, and deploy to Envio's managed runtime.
What Envio does well:
- TypeScript and ReScript project support, with JavaScript handlers also supported
- Multichain indexing
- A local development environment
- HyperSync for historical data retrieval on supported chains
See the HyperIndex overview for current capabilities.
Where Envio has friction:
- Check examples and operational tooling for your target chains
- Plan to adapt mappings and schemas when migrating from subgraphs
- Test backfills, reorg recovery, and query latency under realistic load
Best fit: Greenfield projects where the team is comfortable with TypeScript and wants modern tooling, or projects targeting chains not well-supported by The Graph.
The Graph vs Goldsky vs Envio: Side-by-Side
| Evaluation | The Graph | Goldsky | Envio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary workflow here | Subgraphs | Managed subgraphs and streaming pipelines | HyperIndex handlers |
| Existing subgraph migration | Existing model | Check compatibility | Adapt handlers and schema |
| Data delivery | GraphQL queries | Queries or external destinations | GraphQL queries |
| Test before selecting | Query cost and indexing behavior | Pipeline semantics and destination costs | Handler migration and chain support |
How to Choose
Choose The Graph if: your protocol publishes public data for community use, you need decentralization guarantees, or your existing subgraphs are already live on the network.
Choose Goldsky if: you need fast sync, want data in your own warehouse, or are running a DeFi protocol where query performance directly affects UX.
Choose Envio if: your team writes TypeScript and you are starting fresh, or you are targeting a chain where The Graph coverage is weak.
Run multiple if public query access and internal analytics have different requirements and justify the additional operational work.
Whatever you choose, the indexer is only as good as the schema and handlers feeding it. Platform selection is secondary to data model design.